I tended to my garden intensively for the first time this spring yesterday: late, I know, but the end of the academic year is just too busy for me to engage in anything beyond department business. I did a bit of raking and snipping earlier on, but yesterday was the very first day that I really got my hands dirty: very satisfying. The weather has been absolutely beautiful here; if anything, it’s a bit dry, but I feel terrible complaining when other parts of the country are experiencing either drastic drought or flooding! There are definitely some losses out there: lots of veronica, bee balm, St. John’s Wort, avens. I have two less lady’s slippers than last year and only one jack-in-the-pulpit, but I’m happy that these extra-special plants appeared at all. The side border that runs along Hamilton Hall is absolute perfection if I do say so myself: I am totally in love with the front line of lady’s mantle and sweet cicely. Another plant that looks particularly good this year is epimedium or barrenwort–sometimes also called bishop’s hat. What a great plant: dry shade, little maintenance, neat and tidy! As you can tell from this rambling list of plants, I tend to go for old-fashioned plants and herbs in particular: my garden preferences, like so much of my life, are based on history and curiosity more than anything else. I like to mix old herbs and modern perennials together, and the contrasting combinations are often a bit…….odd. But such is the result when you choose a plant for its heritage rather than its appearance. I’ve got a conundrum now as I brought some woad back my favorite herb farm (The Herb Farmacy, Salisbury, Massachusetts). For the sake of heritage, I had to have this ancient dyeing plant, but does it really belong in my small urban garden? It’s not particularly attractive, a biennial to boot, and blue is my least favorite color.
The obligatory May lady’s slippers picture; epimedium, espaliered yew, sweet cicely, unplanted woad. Below, John White’s “ancient” woad-stained Pict warriors, from Thomas Harriot’s briefe and true report of the new found land of Virginia (1588) and the British Museum. Despite the claims of Julius Caesar and Pliny, there’s a lot of doubt among historians as to whether or not the ancient inhabitants of Britain really stained themselves blue with woad in preparation for battle: just ONE reason why every medievalist I know detests Braveheart!
May 28th, 2015 at 8:31 am
Reblogged this on rennydiokno.com.
May 28th, 2015 at 8:28 pm
I always lumped for Edward II being William Wallace’s son as the “best” history in “Braveheart,” chronology be damned! Made the story line in the miniseries “Rome” whereby some lowly Roman soldier fathers Caesarion seem almost reasonable. Historical cuckoldry just seems so fascinating to modern pop culture. I await the late 21st century holographic melodrama in which it turns out that Bill Clinton and George W. Bush are actually fraternal twins. And you’ll never guess who the parents are!
May 28th, 2015 at 8:38 pm
Just one more movie that historians hate and students love. All they remember is the window scene…and the blue.
May 29th, 2015 at 11:40 am
Keep the woad, Donna! It belongs in your historical garden so that you can teach others (like me!) all about this plant. Since I didn’t know this plant at all, I just did a bit of reading about it. Walking through your garden together would be a perfect history lesson for me! Enjoy happy days in the garden! ♡